Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 October 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [Lords].


Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [Lords]

I too shall be brief. I concur with my right hon. Friend the Member for West Dorset (Mr. Letwin): it is a disgrace that the House should have been detained by the nonsense and ephemera of the Minister's 35-minute filibuster when there are important issues to discuss in respect of the Sustainable Communities Act 2007. I turn now to a subject to which far too little attention has been paid over the past few months and years—the economic assessment of ports. It is totally appropriate for us to debate that subject now, albeit briefly. The Government's policy is that retrospective taxation should take place only when it is fair, proportionate, necessary to protect revenue and in the public interest. The tax on ports is a clear breach of those tests. When they introduced that retrospective tax, the Government disregarded their own rules. No impact assessment was made, no consultation exercise was carried out with those affected—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
497 c246 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Contracts Appeals Construction Civic dignitaries Insolvency Insurance Economic planning Local government Local government finance Payments Planning Public consultation Parish and town councils Public lavatories Regional planning and development Regional development agencies Petitions
Legislation
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk