Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill.


Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill

I thought the early speeches of welcome, delight and gratitude would not last forever. Clause 44 gives local authorities powers to require an institution within the FE sector to provide education to a named individual aged 16 or over but under 19, which is currently a power held by the Learning and Skills Council. We expect that this power will be exercised extremely rarely. However, in the handful of cases where a young person has been turned away from all possible learning options, someone needs to be able to step in to secure them a place. This is not about local authority control over providers. A local authority’s primary concern will be to secure the best possible learning option for the young person—and there are a number of considerations they will need to take into account, including the individual needs of the young person in question, as well as the needs of any providers that are being considered. In order to balance those needs, the local authority would naturally need to enter into a consultative dialogue with the young person, the Connexions service and all possible providers to determine the most suitable option for the young person. In response to the amendment tabled by noble Lords opposite, I can commit today that we will include this requirement to have a consultative dialogue in statutory guidance to local authorities. However, I sense the mood of the House, and I have listened to concerns expressed by noble Lords. We fully intend for there to be a consultative dialogue between local authorities and providers. However, I understand the arguments that have been put forward and I commit to return to the issue at Third Reading, taking those points into account. I will not reply to every question as I am trying to save some time. I say to the noble Lord, Lord Baker, with respect, that that was more of a Second Reading speech rather than a speech that kept to the amendment in question. I was quite shocked. I hope that this genuine assurance to noble Lords will make them feel able to withdraw the amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
714 c63 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Conditions of employment Age Apprentices Advisory services Adult education Employment Finance Education Further education Learning disability Free school meals Local government Qualifications Pay Local education authorities Standards Training Vocational guidance Young people Young offenders Transport Wales Work experience School leaving Sixth form education Literacy Academies Youth Justice Board Numeracy Youth custody Young People's Learning Agency Skills Funding Agency National Apprenticeship Service
Legislation
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk