Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 5 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Coroners and Justice Bill.
Coroners and Justice Bill
My Lords, I am becoming increasingly confused about the procedure the House is now adopting. I am aware of an agreement by the usual channels about the way in which Third Reading amendments may be discussed, or may not be on the advice of the usual channels when the Public Bill Office has indicated that they have been debated on previous occasions. As I understand it, if one starts to make a statement, one is, in fact, moving an amendment. If the noble Baroness wishes to move the amendment, she must seek the permission of the House to do so and is acting against the advice of her own Chief Whip.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 714 c422
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Crime Armed forces Damages Blasphemy Coroners Advocacy Legal profession Finance Fees and charges Forced labour Northern Ireland Scotland Right of search Slavery Treasure Death certificates
- Legislation
- Coroners and Justice Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:40:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592835
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592835
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592835