Proceeding contribution from Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 November 2009. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Sex Discrimination (Religious Organisations).
Sex Discrimination (Religious Organisations)
I disagree. Furthermore, I was puzzled by what the hon. Gentleman said in his speech. Let us say that a religious organisation that is not established came to us and said, ““We are thinking of changing the way in which we discriminate. We are not going to discriminate as much, but we will still have a two-tier system because some bishops or priests will have their authority limited on the basis of their gender by the fact that other people will come in.”” The Church will still be able to use the exemption that has been granted to it to do that. The exemption therefore does not have to be got rid of for the Church of England, whether established or not, to end discrimination. It is available to it to say, ““We are using this exemption in order to discriminate.”” However, unless it had no discrimination whatsoever and no arrangements to help those parishes that will not accept the authority of a woman bishop, it would be better for it to keep the exemption so that it could use it in a more limited way.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 499 c79WH
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Clergy Church of England Bishops Women Enforcement Gender Legislation Discrimination Religion
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:56:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_594428
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_594428
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_594428