Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Policing and Crime Bill.


Policing and Crime Bill

I shall try to answer some of the points that have been mentioned during the debate. I welcome the welcome that the two Opposition Front Benchers gave to the steps that the Government have taken. We have said that there will be a review, that it will be held in three years, that it will be undertaken by the Secretary of State and that the outcome of that review will be published to Parliament. I cannot yet tell either the hon. Member for Hornchurch (James Brokenshire) or the hon. Member for Chesterfield (Paul Holmes) what the format of the review will be. It is likely that it will be about 18 months before we initiate the review, and that will properly be a decision for whoever happens to be the Home Secretary at that time. That might be my right hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull, West and Hessle (Alan Johnson) or another Labour Member—who knows what will happen in these changing times? I am confident that whoever it is will take the right decision and will bring back to Parliament a report on these issues so that they are considered in due course. The hon. Member for Hornchurch mentioned the aspect of the injunctions that concerns those aged under 18. Under 18s can be taken to the High Court or the county court for breach on an injunction but the key point is that the only disposal available for those issues at this stage is a fine, not imprisonment. He will know that we are actively considering a range of issues to do with under-18 injunctions. We may return to the matter very shortly, but we have to consider everything carefully and hon. Members will have opportunities to debate the issues in due course. This is a key provision. A number of tools in the civil and criminal law deal with gangs and the cancer that they can spread. The hon. Member for Hornchurch mentioned criminal activity and the damage that gangs do, but a range of options exist to tackle them. We need to look at them and use them in an appropriate way. As the hon. Member for Chesterfield said, this injunction tool is designed to be a preventive measure, to be used to help and support individuals who might be sucked into the gang culture or who are already in it. Getting such people out of gang culture will benefit both them and, ultimately, wider society. It is not about taking action to crack down on gangs' criminal activity, which is something that should, and will, be undertaken as a matter of course by police forces across the UK. As the hon. Member for Hornchurch said, the proposal arose from the discussions in Birmingham on the Court of Appeal decision. We needed to reflect on that: I think that we have, and I hope that the House agrees that we have listened to the concerns expressed in the other place. I hope too that the amendments on the time limit for the injunctions and on the review will give some comfort to those who felt that the proposals in the Bill were a step too far. I believe that these are valuable amendments and that they give the proper assurances that were sought. I commend them to the House. Lords amendment 30 agreed to. Lords amendments 31 to 39 agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
499 c410-1 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Data protection Databases Criminal investigation Crime Alcoholic drinks Crimes of violence DNA Licensing Drugs Human trafficking Fines Injunctions Police Licensing laws Prostitution Surveillance Young people Sex establishments Body samples
Legislation
Policing and Crime Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk