Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Dan Rogerson (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 10 December 2009. It occurred during Estimates day on Central and Local Government.


Central and Local Government

When I say a long time, I am not talking about decades but, ideally, within the period of a Parliament. It might take longer than that, as the experience of Scotland is showing—whatever the aspiration might be to introduce a local income tax there. Nevertheless, I would certainly want to look at local pilots as a way of bringing forward the proposal. I accept that with all taxation systems there are winners, losers and issues to address, but we must tackle the fundamentals of equity and inequity, which the hon. Member for Wigan (Mr. Turner) mentioned, and the problems of the current council tax system. In my party's view, the council tax system is not delivering and is not fit for purpose. I was also pleased to hear the hon. Member for Wigan mention revaluation. My party would rather this country did not stick with the council tax system, but if we do, revaluation is the logical way to keep it relevant. That presents a problem for parties that want to stick with council tax but either put off revaluation or argue that it is unnecessary.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
502 c598-9 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountability Central government Council tax Local government Powers Public expenditure
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk