Proceeding contribution from Lord Harper (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 January 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Exportable Benefits.
Exportable Benefits
I think the Minister was guilty of slightly mischaracterising what I and my hon. Friend the Member for North Thanet said. I did not ask why the Government disagree with the European Commission. I asked the Minister to set out in detail why the Government think that the past presence test is compatible with the ECJ rule. I have no problem with the Minister disagreeing with the Commission—I frequently do so—so I do not want to leave him with the idea that I am complaining about that. I just want to know why the Government think that what they are doing is compatible with the ECJ ruling. The point that I made about the Commission was that it was apparently being more transparent about its discussion with the British Government than the Government were being.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 503 c183WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Disability living allowance British nationals abroad Attendance allowance EU countries Eligibility Social security benefits Switzerland European Court of Justice Carer's allowance
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:11:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_607030
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_607030
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_607030