Proceeding contribution from Jonathan Shaw (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 January 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Exportable Benefits.
Exportable Benefits
I am pleased that the hon. Gentleman made that point, because it contrasts with the efforts of his colleague, the hon. Member for Forest of Dean—[Hon. Members: " No, it does not."] It was the hon. Member for Forest of Dean who raised the point that I am now responding to and who set the tone. It is reasonable for me to respond to what he said. I happen to disagree with him. If he does not like that, it is a matter for him. We will continue our dialogue with the Commission. We have set out why we believe the past presence test is reasonable and fair. I pay tribute to the hon. Member for North Thanet as he takes this case forward. I am sure that this will not be the last point we hear from him on the subject. I am grateful for the contributions from all hon. Members who have spoken in this morning's debate, which has provided the Government with the opportunity to set out our case. Sitting suspended.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 503 c185WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Disability living allowance British nationals abroad Attendance allowance EU countries Eligibility Social security benefits Switzerland European Court of Justice Carer's allowance
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:11:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_607039
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_607039
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_607039