Proceeding contribution from Jim Cunningham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 January 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on IBM Pension Scheme.
IBM Pension Scheme
There is something more fundamental to the matter—I declare an interest, as I know someone who works for IBM—because many such pension schemes, when we look at their origins, are subject to wage negotiations, and it is the over-50s in particular who will be hard hurt by that. For example, sometimes pensions were negotiated to offset a wage increase and additional holidays. The concern is far more fundamental, and if there was ever a group of people entitled to get their full pension without changes, it is that group of workers.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 503 c302WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Workplace pensions Monitoring Regulation IBM
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:08:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608320
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608320
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608320