Proceeding contribution from David Cairns (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 January 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on IBM Pension Scheme.
IBM Pension Scheme
My hon. Friend says that she is not in a position to speculate on IBM's reasons and she is right about that. However, when some of us met IBM we were told that this change was made because of the comparatively poor performance of IBM UK and Ireland. Yet in his final missive to workers issued yesterday, Brendan Riley said that it had been a privilege to lead one of the best performing parts of IBM UK. So there is a clear inconsistency in the message that IBM is sending out: either it is a poor performer or it is a good performer. I am afraid to say that the reality is that hon. Members are right. Whether the Government can do anything about this, I do not know. This is redundancy on the cheap: that is what IBM is up to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 503 c307WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Workplace pensions Monitoring Regulation IBM
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:08:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608341
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608341
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608341