Proceeding contribution from Jeremy Browne (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 20 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Fiscal Responsibility Bill.
Fiscal Responsibility Bill
Was not the hon. Member for North Ayrshire and Arran (Ms Clark) talking about two separate issues? There is a discussion to be had about Britain's creditworthiness and about whether the Conservative party is talking down our economic recovery prospects, but that bundle of issues is completely separate from the issue of whether a Fiscal Responsibility Bill is desirable. It is possible to decide to be fiscally responsible without the need for a Fiscal Responsibility Bill, and it seems to me that it is desirable to be fiscally responsible, although not in the way that the Conservatives suggest. I believe that we, as a country, need to demonstrate a desire and an ability to get to grips with the deficit. However, the question of why on earth the Treasury needs to establish a legal framework rather than just getting on with doing the job that they are paid to do is completely separate from that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 504 c364
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Audit Banks Borrowing Fiscal policy Economic situation Economic policy Economic growth National income Public expenditure Public finance Public sector debt Taxation Economic recession
- Legislation
- Fiscal Responsibility Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 10:03:08 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_612239
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_612239
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_612239