Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 20 January 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Digital Economy Bill [HL].


Digital Economy Bill [HL]

My Lords, I failed to mention one further element. The noble Lord, Lord Howard, is right about solicitors’ codes of conduct with regard to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority. It should be made clear to many of these individuals who have been bullied in this way that the SRA is available to them if they wish to make a complaint. It is difficult, though, even in those circumstances. I remind the Minister, for the purposes of his response, that the reason why my noble friend Lord Razzall originally put down an amendment that said one should go first of all according to the codes rather than to court was entirely to try to eliminate this kind of issue. Obviously one cannot exclude the court completely, but one of the questions that the Minister might consider, certainly in drawing up the codes, is whether some kind of presumption should be stated in the code that most copyright owners will proceed according to the CIR notification process rather than through this kind of court action process. That is not a formal amendment, but it is something that I think the Minister should put into the pot in terms of his considerations.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c1041 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Codes of practice Appeals Broadcasting Costs Competition Computer networks Copyright Communication Fees and charges ICT Internet Ofcom Tribunals Subscriptions Internet service providers
Legislation
Digital Economy Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk