Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bramall (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 3 February 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Strategic Defence Review.


Strategic Defence Review

My Lords, I too thank the noble Baroness for repeating the Statement on the Government’s Green Paper and for the sensible things she has said about co-operation, partnership and a fully joined-up security policy. I should like to be clear on one thing. Although the Minister may be technically correct in saying, "not a penny will be cut from next year’s budget", is it not true that because of the current Ministry of Defence overspend—caused, largely unavoidably, by overspill from operational requirements in Afghanistan and the inclusion of certain items of equipment, some for political reasons, for which proper strategic decisions on capability have not yet been made—at this very moment the Treasury is clawing back from defence’s cash flow no less than £1 billion in this first year? This money has to be found from somewhere, and usually involves considerable penalties, particularly in the longer term. Finally, as economy of effort is one of the principles of war, how would the Minister actually measure affordability, much mentioned in the Green Paper? Presumably with defence of the realm and security, this country can afford what it believes it truly needs. Is the intention merely to leave it to the Treasury to come up with less money than the year before?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c210-1 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Armed forces Defence Defence equipment Finance Public expenditure Peacekeeping operations Procurement Military alliances Afghanistan
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk