Proceeding contribution from Lord Northbourne (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 8 February 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.
Child Poverty Bill
My Lords, I have not suggested in my amendment that the title of the Bill should not reflect child poverty; I have left the words ““child poverty”” in there. What I have done to produce a title that slightly more realistically represents the balance of the Bill is put ““household income”” before ““child poverty””, but I would be happy to put it the other way around if the Minister preferred. Why is he not prepared to accept the fact that the Bill is about household income?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 717 c146GC
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Children Devolved matters Children in care Alcoholic drinks Disadvantaged Costs Cohabitation Employment Families Gambling Drugs Homelessness Ethnic groups Economic situation Free school meals Marriage Northern Ireland Parents Poverty Public consultation Misuse Minority groups Lone parents Scotland Social security benefits Welfare tax credits Wales Registration of births, deaths, marriages and civil partnerships Child Poverty Commission
- Legislation
- Child Poverty Bill 2008-09 to 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:04:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620163
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620163
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620163