Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 4 March 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
One of the great joys of being a Minister is that I do not have to decide whether offences have been committed. That is the job of the police, not the Minister with responsibility for policing, and that is part of the separation of powers. We will provide the framework, the funding, the support and the general policy direction, but ultimately it is for the Metropolitan Police Commissioner to determine whether prosecutions should be suggested to the Crown Prosecution Service so that charges may be brought. The right to protest is valid, and I have not seen any evidence that the terms of the 2000 Act were broken nor of charges being brought as a result of that demonstration, so—self-evidently—the police must have taken the same view. The policing of the demonstration was very effective.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 506 c1039
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Evidence Proscribed organisations Terrorism Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam al Shabaab
- Legislation
- Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2010
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:06:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_626717
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_626717
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_626717