Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 4 March 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.


Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism

One of the great joys of being a Minister is that I do not have to decide whether offences have been committed. That is the job of the police, not the Minister with responsibility for policing, and that is part of the separation of powers. We will provide the framework, the funding, the support and the general policy direction, but ultimately it is for the Metropolitan Police Commissioner to determine whether prosecutions should be suggested to the Crown Prosecution Service so that charges may be brought. The right to protest is valid, and I have not seen any evidence that the terms of the 2000 Act were broken nor of charges being brought as a result of that demonstration, so—self-evidently—the police must have taken the same view. The policing of the demonstration was very effective.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
506 c1039 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Evidence Proscribed organisations Terrorism Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam al Shabaab
Legislation
Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2010
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk