Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 4 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on Chair (Terminology).


Chair (Terminology)

As a member of the Wright Committee, I would like to explain our approach to the right hon. Gentleman. I agree with much of what he has said about the 27 days, but topical debates ought to be a matter for the Back-Bench business committee. When added up, they amount to another seven days. The other three days for his 35 could be used for debates on Members' pay and allowances, for example, or for matters such as those relating to the hon. Member whose offices were raided by the police. Such matters should rightly be for the House and not in the purview of the Government, whichever party is in office.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
506 c1069 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Committees Elections House of Commons Public appointments Parliamentary procedure Reform Terminology Select committees Backbenchers Standing orders Private members' time Deputy Speakers Order of business Select Committee on Reform of the House of Commons
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk