Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Friday, 5 March 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL].


Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL]

Of course they are relevant. I am using the procedures of the House to ensure that the Government explain their scheme. They made the announcement as a direct result of the Bill introduced by the noble Baroness, and the Bill in another place. If the noble Lord says that that is not the case, I have doubts. Noble Lords are giving their view on the Bill—that they do not think it is necessary. It is now passing through this House. It is perfectly legitimate and I shall continue to ask those questions. I am asking the Government about the Statement that was made two or three weeks after the Second Reading of this Bill and one week before its Committee stage. I did not table any amendments until that statement, so it is relevant today.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c1708 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Damages Asbestos Fees and charges Liability Insurance Legal costs Industrial diseases Mesothelioma Research Pleural plaques
Legislation
Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk