Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Friday, 5 March 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL].


Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am grateful for the support of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Carswell. Amendments 6 and 7 are, to some extent, alternatives. They are tabled to highlight the problem of how we assess the damages that should be paid out for something that is asymptomatic. That is the point I was seeking to address and I am grateful for the debate on it. I shall want to come back to this on Report because there are real concerns involved. I note what the noble and learned Lord, the Minister and the noble Baroness have said. I shall seek to bring the amendments or something similar back later. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw Amendment 6. Amendment 6 withdrawn. Amendment 7 not moved. Clause 1 agreed Amendment 8 not moved. Amendment 9 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c1714-5 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Damages Asbestos Fees and charges Liability Insurance Legal costs Industrial diseases Mesothelioma Research Pleural plaques
Legislation
Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk