Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Friday, 5 March 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL].
Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL]
My Lords, I am grateful for the support of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Carswell. Amendments 6 and 7 are, to some extent, alternatives. They are tabled to highlight the problem of how we assess the damages that should be paid out for something that is asymptomatic. That is the point I was seeking to address and I am grateful for the debate on it. I shall want to come back to this on Report because there are real concerns involved. I note what the noble and learned Lord, the Minister and the noble Baroness have said. I shall seek to bring the amendments or something similar back later. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw Amendment 6. Amendment 6 withdrawn. Amendment 7 not moved. Clause 1 agreed Amendment 8 not moved. Amendment 9 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 717 c1714-5
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Damages Asbestos Fees and charges Liability Insurance Legal costs Industrial diseases Mesothelioma Research Pleural plaques
- Legislation
- Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill (HL) 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:11:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627129
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627129
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627129