Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Quin (Labour) in the House of Lords on Friday, 5 March 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL].


Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL]

My Lords, one of the amendments seems to say that some amount for medical research would be deducted from the damages awarded. If this involves taking money away from the claimant, I would be strongly opposed to it. I am not sure that it would comply with human rights legislation. Perhaps the Minister could comment on that. Certainly, it would be a worrying development if that were to be the case. However, I share a concern that the noble Lord has expressed on several occasions. I sympathise with his concern that lawyers should not profit excessively from these arrangements. His amendment seeks to tease out from the Government how they feel arrangements should be made to prevent lawyers making excessive profits. I would be very reluctant to see anything that seemed to deduct damages from the claimant or victim as a result of the noble Lord’s amendments.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c1718 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Damages Asbestos Fees and charges Liability Insurance Legal costs Industrial diseases Mesothelioma Research Pleural plaques
Legislation
Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk