Proceeding contribution from Keith Vaz (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 8 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Crime and Security Bill.
Crime and Security Bill
I am sure the hon. Gentleman would be the first to admit that the Government have moved since Second Reading. That is because of the pressure from all sides of the House. Does he accept that we are in this situation because the Government ought to have moved quickly on the removal of DNA profiles from the database? If that system had been working more effectively, we would not be in the position that we are in today.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 507 c40
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Criminal investigation Crime Alcoholic drinks Administration of justice Anti-social behaviour Fingerprints Immobilisation of vehicles Licensing Genetics Domestic abuse Licensed premises Identification of criminals Drunkenness Injunctions Protection Organised crime Opening hours Licensing laws Sentencing Young offenders Alcohol disorder zones Domestic violence protection orders Domestic violence protection notices
- Legislation
- Crime and Security Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:07:32 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627714
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627714
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627714