Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 8 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Crime and Security Bill.

Crime and Security Bill

I have been trying to follow the hon. Gentleman's logic. He is content for DNA to be taken for up to three years for serious offences, but not for up to six years, and I cannot quite understand the logic of the difference between the two, apart from the time scale given the judgment that has been made. I really cannot see his logic.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
507 c41 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Criminal investigation Crime Alcoholic drinks Administration of justice Anti-social behaviour Fingerprints Immobilisation of vehicles Licensing Genetics Domestic abuse Licensed premises Identification of criminals Drunkenness Injunctions Protection Organised crime Opening hours Licensing laws Sentencing Young offenders Alcohol disorder zones Domestic violence protection orders Domestic violence protection notices
Legislation
Crime and Security Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk