Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Burrowes (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 9 March 2010. It occurred during Opposition day on Health Care in London.


Health Care in London

I think that in many ways the deal was done before the point of engagement was even reached. As other Conservative Members have pointed out, the decision had already been made. Models have been adopted, irrespective of the different clinical needs. Eighteen months on, we are seeing not just a campaign on Chase Farm, but a prospect that is even worse, whether that is at the Whittington or elsewhere. The £500 million funding gap is raised, and there is the question of whether between one and three major acute hospitals—the North Middlesex or Barnet, for example—will retain a 24-hour A and E service. A document published by NHS London questions whether it would be safe for those local hospitals to retain their maternity units, despite the increasing birth rate and increasing demand. The proposals are unacceptable, and it is clear that we should halt them, not for the purpose of political convenience but because of the need for proper financial and clinical models. The choice is clear: people can support Labour if they want the status quo—a continued hospital downgrade—or they can support the Conservatives if they want the security of change that is based on local and clinical need.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
507 c203 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disadvantaged Cost effectiveness Closures Hospitals Health services Expenditure Greater London General practitioners NHS Management Standards Reorganisation Accident and emergency departments Per capita costs Health centres Treatment centres London Strategic Health Authority Olympic Games 2012
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk