Proceeding contribution from Paul Clark (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 17 March 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Personal Oxygen (Public Transport).
Personal Oxygen (Public Transport)
Regarding the code we issue to assist airlines and to enable interpretation, we are clear that that is possible, but that code is based on the EU regulation so it would be difficult to go beyond that for the UK only. Indeed, in the cases that my hon. Friend listed, many UK-based airlines have a good record in meeting the needs of those who require this service. We should recognise that since the last discussion of this issue in the House, Thomson Airways and First Choice have come on board. I pay tribute to my hon. Friend and to all the organisations that have raised this issue and kept it in the public domain. There has to be an international solution and international regulations, but the work that has been undertaken has convinced airlines to rise to the challenge, which is why such movement has happened. Today's debate helps in that process of focusing minds.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 507 c933
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disability Codes of practice Aviation Buses Patients Public transport Taxis Travel Oxygen
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:26:21 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631830
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631830
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631830