Proceeding contribution from Hugh Bayley (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 March 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Zimbabwe.
Zimbabwe
We did not discuss with Lord Carrington the situation after the Lancaster house talks, other than in the most general terms. However, one pillar on which the agreement rested was the principle that the political arrangements—the constitution as agreed at Lancaster House—would remain in force for either 10 or 20 years. Somebody will correct me—[Hon. Members: "Ten years."] Yes, of course, because it was 10 years later that the constitution was changed to create a different political arrangement. One plank of the Lancaster house agreement was that until or unless the constitution was changed, land title would change only on the basis that a willing seller sold to a willing buyer. In fairness to Robert Mugabe, after a bloody war against an illegal settler regime, he honoured that agreement to the letter. The problems arose later.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 508 c102WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Development aid Land Human rights Farms Ownership Politics and government Reform Violence Zimbabwe
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-11 18:09:19 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633720
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633720
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633720