Proceeding contribution from Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 29 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on Draft Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy (EN–1).
Draft Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy (EN–1)
My Lords, I promised that I would not exercise my right of reply at any length, and I will not. On the Minister’s final point, I am not satisfied that the way that we have dealt with this has been the best one. The right answer—I said this during our debates on the Planning Bill—would have been to have had a Joint Committee of both Houses so that this House as well as the other place could have listened to the evidence and had the chance of examining witnesses. We did not have that; instead, we had what I might call unilateral debates in the Moses Room. I want to put that on the record. There will be further national policy statements, and it would behove whichever Government were in office after the election to have another look at that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 718 c1224
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Carbon capture and storage Environment protection Investment Energy Electricity generation Infrastructure Kent Planning permission Planning Ports Power stations Nuclear power stations Pollution control Carbon emissions Safety Renewable energy Shipping Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Fossil fuelled power stations Liquefied natural gas
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-05-18 08:19:59 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_634934
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_634934
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_634934