Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord West of Spithead (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 April 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Crime and Security Bill.


Crime and Security Bill

My Lords, we believe that the amendment is unnecessary as the circumstances described are already covered by the powers in Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. An amendment to Section 60, made by the Serious Crime Act 2007, extended the powers to add a further circumstance in which they can be used—namely, where a serious violent incident has occurred, the police believe that the weapon used in the incident is being carried in the locality and it is expedient to give an authorisation to find the weapon. Notwithstanding the good intentions of the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford, I also have to say that we consider his proposal to be rather sweeping, as the noble Baronesses, Lady Hamwee and Lady Neville-Jones, have touched on, and lacking in the appropriate level of safeguards for those who might be searched under the power. There is also the issue of the area being covered, as well as a number of other items. On the basis that the powers sought by the noble Lord’s amendment are already largely available to the police, and due to our other concerns, I ask him to withdraw his amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c1542-3 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Databases Criminal records Crime Crimes of violence Anti-social behaviour Fingerprints DNA Firearms Injunctions Police Powers Prisoners Passports Scotland Young people Right of search Anti-terrorism control orders
Legislation
Crime and Security Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk