Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 April 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Children, Schools and Families Bill.


Children, Schools and Families Bill

I thank the Minister for her assurance that should her Government by any chance be re-elected on 6 May, she will bring this matter forward again. If she has the opportunity to do so, we will press her to go further than the recommendations of Sir Roger Singleton. She relies on a potential inconsistency in what I am trying to achieve between the legal position of a parent who hits a child and that of a grandmother who hits a child. I ask her to consider the inconsistency for children as regards their protection vis-à-vis the laws of assault compared with adults. It is illegal to assault an adult; it is not fully illegal to assault a child. However, the hour is late. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 40 withdrawn. Clause 31 disagreed. Clause 32 : Restriction on publication of information relating to family proceedings Clause 32 : Restriction on publication of information relating to family proceedings Debate on whether Clause 32 should stand part of the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c1599 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Children Disclosure of information Devolved matters Discipline Corporal punishment Licensing Family courts National Assembly for Wales Pupils Newspaper press Media Parental responsibility Personal, social, health and economic education Standards Schools Teachers Young offenders Safety Wales
Legislation
Children, Schools and Families Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk