Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 April 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill.

Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill

I argue that Clauses 20, 21, 22 and 23 should not stand part of the Bill. We think that for appropriate reasons this part of the Bill should not be pursued this evening. Clauses 20 disagreed. Clauses 21 to 23 disagreed. Schedule 3 disagreed. Clause 24 : Treaties to be laid before Parliament before ratification Clause 24 : Treaties to be laid before Parliament before ratification Amendment 7 not moved. Clause 24 agreed. Clause 25 : Extension of 21 sitting day period Amendment 8 Clause 25 : Extension of 21 sitting day period Amendment 8 Moved by

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c1618-9 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Disciplinary proceedings Codes of practice Demonstrations Civil servants Civil service Diplomatic service Career development By-elections Constitutional and administrative law Elections Freedom of information Human rights House of Lords House of Commons Electoral Commission Hereditary peers Legislation Domicil Recruitment Prisoners Parliament Square Management Members Referendums Parliamentary scrutiny Peers Palace of Westminster Special advisers Public order National Audit Office Standards Voting methods Treaties Reform Voting rights Taxation Civil Service Commission
Legislation
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill 2008-09 to 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk