Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Alan Campbell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 7 April 2010. It occurred during Legislative debate on Dangerous Drugs.


Dangerous Drugs

In the short time available to me, I wish to comment, in reverse order, on the main points that have been raised. The hon. Member for Oxford, West and Abingdon (Dr. Harris) made a number of serious allegations. The first was that the ACMD was not properly constituted when it came to this decision; we reject that view. He said that evidence was not properly considered; we reject that view. He said that this decision was based not on evidence but on tabloid headlines; we reject that view. He said that advisers were bullied and threatened by Ministers into making this decision; we reject that view, too. The hon. Gentleman needs to examine the evidence that the chair of the ACMD gave to the Select Committee on Home Affairs on 23 March—I believe that was the date—because he would then see that the relationship is very different from the one that he describes. If the hon. Gentleman is so concerned about the process that we have gone through, and so concerned that the principles on which he relies for good decision making have somehow not been matched on this occasion, he should stick to his principles and to the logic of his arguments and oppose this order, instead of trying to dance on the head of the pin with the logic of his argument. One of the allegations made by the hon. Member for Hornchurch (James Brokenshire) was that the Government have "downplayed" drugs seizures during our time in office; that is not true. He talked about the work of the Serious Organised Crime Agency and the UK Border Agency, and I have outlined their response to the issue before us. There is a fundamental misunderstanding in the question that he asks, because SOCA does have a role to play. However, it often has a role to play downstream; it is no good simply strengthening borders—we are, however, doing that—because we have to address the issue of drugs further downstream. My hon. Friend the Member for Bolton, South-East (Dr. Iddon) raised the issue of poly-use and of drug and alcohol use. I welcome his contribution, because what he says is right. Whoever carries out this role after the general election, and whichever party is in government, they and this House will have to return to this issue, because it is important. My right hon. Friend the Member for Leicester, East (Keith Vaz) again raised the issue of policy at a European level. There is disagreement among European countries about the best way to develop drugs policy, but there is a growing acceptance of the need for a harm-reduction approach. I also very much welcome the evolving approach of the new Administration in the United States. One hour having elapsed since the commencement of proceedings on the motion, the Deputy Speaker put the Question (Order, this day). Question agreed to. Resolved,"That the draft Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2010, which was laid before this House on 30 March, be approved."


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
508 c1043 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Drugs Health education Imports Misuse Regulation Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Mephedrone
Legislation
Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2010
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk