Proceeding contribution from David Gauke (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 7 April 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
Clearly, there could be a serious impact on British tourism, which would be regrettable. That is why we proposed reforms that would be revenue-neutral, and we want to consult further to protect revenue and ensure that individual parts of the country are not heavily affected by the Government's proposal, which would damage tourism and wider communities. We are pleased to have got that out of the Bill.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 508 c1092
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Corporation tax Capital investment Cider Income tax Excise duties Fuels Double taxation Economic situation Pensions National insurance contributions Taxation Tobacco Stamp duties Smuggling First time buyers Stamp duty land tax
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:05:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_637487
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_637487
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_637487