Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jack Straw (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 8 April 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill.


Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill

It might be helpful if I begin by explaining to the House the conclusion that was reached in the other place last night. As colleagues of some antiquity will appreciate, the wash-up, by definition, inevitably involves a compression of the legislative process, and business can get through only by agreement. In their lordships' House, that agreement requires not only a majority vote but widespread consent across the Chamber. We were faced with a situation where a number of Back-Bench Members had tabled amendments to delete every single clause. As a consequence, we were faced with difficult but inevitable choices that involved discussions with those Members, party leaders and the leader of the Cross-Bench group to arrive at an accommodation.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
508 c1203 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Alternative vote Civil service Referendums Voting methods
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk