Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Christopher (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 17 June 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Public Expenditure: Review of Commitments.


Public Expenditure: Review of Commitments

My Lords, picking up on the point made by my noble friend Lady Farrington, the Minister indicated that the Government are now heavily relying on private investment in projects that have been dropped. My noble friend mentioned Sheffield Forgemasters, about which we have been given little information, but if you are going to rely on the private sector in that area, you are certainly seeking to whip a dead horse. The private sector has not contributed to any significant degree in the specialist steels required in the nuclear industry, in which I have had a past interest; it was deplorable to me to see how much steel was being imported in order for us even to maintain and expand what we had in the nuclear industry. Does the Minister agree that it is right that the public should know how much the Government expect to expend in importing steel instead of making it, how many jobs might have been created that will not now be created, what will be the loss to the local community because this is not being proceeded with and—to take up the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Higgins—whether this decision makes any sense, as the money was going out not this year or next year but progressively over a considerable period?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
719 c1112 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Hospitals Employment schemes Kent NHS Public expenditure Loans Public libraries Schools Transport Sports Research Walking Stonehenge Cuts Building schools for the future programme Local authority business growth incentives scheme Sheffield Forgemasters North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk