Proceeding contribution from John Pugh (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 July 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HC) and Debate on bill on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
Is the hon. Gentleman saying that 17.5% would not have made a difference—that it was not regressive and would not have hit exactly the same groups? If it was regressive, why did he not do something about it?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 513 c820
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Poverty Charities Exemptions Excise duties Fuels Economic situation Pensioners Low incomes Rural areas Taxation VAT Rescue services Tax burden Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-06 09:31:54 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_654939
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_654939
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_654939