Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sassoon (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 July 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Contribution to Costs of Special Resolution Regime) Regulations 2010.


Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Contribution to Costs of Special Resolution Regime) Regulations 2010

Well, we have gone from Sturm und Drang to something else and, if I can spread a little joy by introducing the term FSMA, I am happy to do so. I shall be brief. As the last three years have shown, banks and building societies can fail. The Banking Act 2009 provides for a system of bank resolution that is more flexible than simply liquidating the failed institution, using insolvency law and paying, if necessary, compensation to depositors who would have lost money in the process. Bank resolutions can be costly but they can save the Financial Services Compensation Scheme from having to make compensation payments to the depositors from the institution concerned. It is right, therefore, that the FSCS should have to contribute towards resolution costs and it is equally right that contribution to such costs should be capped at the cost of the compensation that it would otherwise have had to pay, taking into account recoveries that it would be expected to make. These regulations do not change those principles but ensure that they can be correctly applied in the real world, where bank resolutions take time and the FSCS would have to borrow heavily to fund compensation payouts. There is, of course, a lot of technical detail in the regulations—that is inevitable—but the basic idea is simple. The reason for the large amount of technical detail, in answer to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Davies of Oldham, is that checking the accounts is not simple. I do not know how properly to address the points made by my noble friend Lord Newby, who would like to use this opportunity to hear about wider developments in EU and international financial regulation. The only point that I make now is that, of course, the question of bank resolution and particularly of globally significant systemic institutions is one on which the G20 Ministers are focusing at the moment. In our small way, tidying up the FSCS regulations fits into a wider picture of the direction of travel and the focus of the global regulatory developments. Motion agreed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
720 c887-8 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Costs Financial services Financial institutions Payments Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Legislation
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Contribution to Costs of Special Resolution Regime) Regulations 2010
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk