Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Onslow (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 27 July 2010. It occurred during Debate on select committee report on Privileges and Conduct.


Privileges and Conduct

My Lords, I was on the Joint Committee on Human Rights when these allegations were made. We were advised by our clerks that this was a clear breach of privilege. The effect of the lobbying—which there undoubtedly was—was obviously going to be minimal, because the three people whom others attempted to nobble were grown-up and intelligent enough to maintain the views that they had maintained the whole way through the discussion on Trevor Phillips’s behaviour. Admittedly, there was discussion in the committee and some people favoured a harsher report than others, but we came up with what was in effect a unanimous opinion. However, I am quite disappointed—that is the best way to put it—that this is what the Committee for Privileges found. I yield to no man in my admiration for the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine of Lairg. He obviously has an extremely clever legal brain, so it would be a foolhardy person who disagreed with what he said. However, at the time it seemed to us that there was a clear breach and I maintain that opinion.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
720 c1236 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conduct House of Lords Equality and Human Rights Commission Parliamentary procedure Lobbying Witnesses Select committees Joint Committee on Human Rights Procedure Committee (HL) Contempt of Parliament Phillips, Trevor
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk