Proceeding contribution from Meg Hillier (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 15 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Documents Bill.
Identity Documents Bill
If the hon. Gentleman had had the courtesy to listen, he would have heard me deal with that point at the beginning of my comments. We also suggest an alternative, so the Government have a choice. The Minister has two options in order to be fair to those members of the British public who bought a card in good faith. The alternative is to allow cards to continue for 10 years and, again, with the permission of the individual cardholder, for data to be migrated to the passport database, which is not a terribly difficult transaction, so that ID cards can continue as passports. We recognise that that is not a perfect solution, because with few cards already out there and, given all the points that we rehearsed in Committee about someone's ability to recognise the document, there might still be issues. However, that would represent a choice for the individual who had paid their £30 to have the card.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 515 c922
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Civil liberties Databases Biometrics Costs Fraud Fees and charges Identity cards Personal records National identity register Proof of identity Passports Repayments Identity and Passport Service Transgender people
- Legislation
- Identity Documents Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:29:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664930
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664930
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664930