Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Damian Green (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 15 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Documents Bill.


Identity Documents Bill

Of course the Department that the hon. Lady used to be responsible for would not put the security of our passports at risk. To answer the hon. Lady's other point, information relevant to future investigations would be retained under the proposals before us, with the amendments here. I hope that she will agree that that strikes an appropriate balance. Genuine concerns were expressed—not just by my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridge (Dr Huppert), but by Members of all parties—to the effect that the simple repetition of the original clause might put us at the wrong side on the spectrum between transparency and security. That is why I agreed to put the 28-day provision directly in the Bill. The hon. Lady asked about that, and I see no reason to believe that this will in any way inhibit or impede anti-fraud operations. What the amendments will do by changing the clause is to allow operations to be properly conducted while at the same time reassuring individual applicants that any information they give is not kept for an unnecessarily long period of time. That is what this set of amendments is designed to achieve. I commend them to the House. Amendment 1 agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
515 c960 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Civil liberties Databases Biometrics Costs Fraud Fees and charges Identity cards Personal records National identity register Proof of identity Passports Repayments Identity and Passport Service Transgender people
Legislation
Identity Documents Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk