Proceeding contribution from Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Equitable Life (Payments) Bill.
Equitable Life (Payments) Bill
My hon. Friend referred to cases in which the rules of the scheme might not have been correctly applied, but such are the complexities of Equitable Life policyholders—for example, a constituent of mine whose policies were additional voluntary contributions in a pension scheme which has been wound up—that someone might wish to argue that their particular type of case had not been envisaged in the way the rules were formulated, and that a specific decision needed to be made in that case. Will the scheme be wide enough to make that possible?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 518 c332
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Financial services Insolvency Equitable Life Assurance Society Pensioners Payments Equitable Life Ex-gratia Payment Scheme Review Ex gratia payments National Savings and Investments
- Legislation
- Equitable Life (Payments) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:23:02 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_679250
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_679250
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_679250