Proceeding contribution from Michael Dugher (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 11 November 2010. It occurred during Backbench debate on Policy for Growth.
Policy for Growth
I will not; Yorkshire men are normally very generous, as the hon. Gentleman knows, but we are short of time today. Even the director general of the CBI has voiced concerns about where the jobs will come from. Next week, Professor Steve Fothergill of the centre for regional economic and social research at Sheffield Hallam university will launch a report, which I urge all right hon. and hon. Members to read, called ““Tackling worklessness in Britain's weaker local economies””. It has an important foreword by the leader of Barnsley council, Steve Houghton, and makes it absolutely clear that, under the Government's current framework, job demand in Britain's weaker local economies, particularly in post-industrial areas such as Barnsley, is low and unlikely to grow significantly in the coming period. The situation is made worse by the cuts that the Government are making to local authorities, which will be particularly bad in areas such as my own, where the council tax receipts are lower and there is greater reliance on central Government funding. In such areas, the local authority is critical not just as a direct provider of employment but in generating private sector economic activity and employment. The ““public sector bad, private sector good”” view that Conservative Members put forward completely fails to understand that there is often a greatly complementary relationship between the two. Government support for a strong public sector is critical. I ask Members also to examine the coalfields review produced by the former Member for Barnsley, West and Penistone, Michael Clapham. It made it clear that areas such as my own are more isolated than others and have a higher mortality rate, greater health difficulties, greater overall deprivation, fewer businesses per head of population and 25% fewer jobs per resident, and there are more young people not in education, work or training. Such areas are very different from others, and because of the Government's proposals, I, like other hon. Members, am very worried about their future.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 518 c483-4
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Banks Capital investment Credit Financial services Economic growth Inflation Public expenditure Mortgages Policy Small businesses Regulation Taxation Cuts
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:38:50 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_680010
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_680010
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_680010