Proceeding contribution from Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Documents Bill.
Identity Documents Bill
The noble Earl is quite right. It has always been the intention, whether in opposition or in government, to scrap the ID cards scheme at the least possible extra cost to the taxpayer. Our primary purpose has been to prevent further expense being incurred when we can avoid it. We have no option but to pay compensation to some contractors because we are tied in by the contracts negotiated by our predecessors. That is a contractual agreement, and we are negotiating at the moment what that final sum should be. We do not agree that there is a contract between the Government and cardholders who received a service, nor do we believe that there is any expropriation of property or rights under it. The cardholders are not card-owners; the noble Lords who said that the card was government property were quite right to say so.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 722 c790
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Databases Costs Identity cards Personation National identity register Reviews
- Legislation
- Identity Documents Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:46:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682782
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682782
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682782