Debate on bill on Wednesday, 17 November 2010, in the House of Lords.
Identity Documents Bill
Identity Documents Bill. Lords report stage debate. Amendment to clause 2 agreed on division (220 to 188). Bill reported.
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 722 c782-811
- Session
- 2010-12
- Legislative stage
- Report stage
- Procedure
- Government defeats
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Related items
-
Identity Documents Bill. Brought from the Commons. Explanatory Notes HL Bill 19-EN also published.
Thursday, 16 September 2010
Bills
House of Lords
- Proceeding contributions
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c809 (Link to this contribution) With the greatest respect to the noble Lord, the Earl Ferrers—
-
Earl Ferrers | 722 c809 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Hunt, is a very bright noble Lord, and he normally picks up things straight awa...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c809 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I think that the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, was quite right to correct us on this matt...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 722 c809 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, while we are in a correcting mood, may I remind the House that we are actually on Report a...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c810 (Link to this contribution) I shall make two points about that. First, I fully understand the point that the noble Lord is raisi...
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c810 (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lord for giving way. Before we forget, we need to remember that the ID system that...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c810 (Link to this contribution) I look forward to further debates on those matters. The noble Lord is quite right. I hope that your ...
-
Lord Stoddart of Swindon | 722 c810 (Link to this contribution) The fact of the matter is, as the noble Lord must know, a lot of the material gathered by Google has...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c810-1 (Link to this contribution) Two separate issues seem to have been debated under this amendment. The first was whether one needs ...
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c811 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for what my noble friend the Minister has said. I am happy to withdraw the amendment, ...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c811 (Link to this contribution) I am happy to give such an assurance to the House.
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c811 (Link to this contribution) On that basis I am happy to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 6 withdrawn.
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c807 (Link to this contribution) I beg your pardon.
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c807 (Link to this contribution) I am thoroughly schooled, my Lords, and deeply grateful to—I scarcely dare address him now—the noble...
-
Earl Ferrers | 722 c807 (Link to this contribution) My noble friend referred to Earl Erroll. Actually, he should have said the noble Earl, Lord Erroll, ...
-
Lord Rosser | 722 c806 (Link to this contribution) Obviously, the reason for bringing forward this amendment relates to the evidence given in Committee...
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c807 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this amendment was moved in Committee. I bring it back and I hope that what my noble frien...
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c806-7 (Link to this contribution) 6: After Clause 10, insert the following new Clause— ““Independent review (1) The Secretary of State...
-
Earl Ferrers | 722 c807 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord!
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c807 (Link to this contribution) Oh my gosh. I shall go back to school. This is a basic and simple matter. I shall be interested to ...
-
Earl Ferrers | 722 c809 (Link to this contribution) It is the noble Earl, Lord Ferrers. For goodness’ sake, the noble Lord is still on the Front Bench. ...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c809 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is a great pleasure to welcome the noble Lord, the Earl Ferrers, to our debates on—
-
Baroness Hamwee | 722 c809 (Link to this contribution) In Committee I raised the issues on subsection (10) to which reference has just been made, and I did...
-
Earl of Erroll | 722 c808 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is the noble Earl. It is very confusing. I am actually the Earl of Erroll, but we are i...
-
Baroness Hamwee | 722 c808 (Link to this contribution) In Committee I raised the point on subsection (10) to which the noble Lord referred. Is it the noble...
-
Earl of Erroll | 722 c808 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, if I had got my act together a bit more quickly, I would have added my name to the amendme...
-
Lord Maxton | 722 c807-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the noble Lord who moved the amendment may be slightly surprised to know that I support it...
-
Earl of Erroll | 722 c809 (Link to this contribution) If noble Lords will indulge me for two seconds, the only person who is the exception here is the nob...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c795 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I say to the government Front Bench that we are out of order. It is the job of the Front B...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c795 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may just say that I have undertaken to take the point away. I have done so in good faith a...
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c795 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I say to the Minister that her good faith is not at issue at all. The issue is whether it ...
-
Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 722 c795 (Link to this contribution) It is not me to give this advice, except in response to what my noble friend has asked. However, as ...
-
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 722 c796 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I understand that there are anxieties around the House. The House is self-regulating, unli...
-
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton | 722 c796 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, with respect we are faced with an issue of law—
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c793 (Link to this contribution) This is the position of the Government, my Lords.
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c793 (Link to this contribution) In answer to an earlier intervention regarding the position of the law officers, my noble friend sai...
-
Lord Filkin | 722 c793 (Link to this contribution) I will be brief. There are times when we have to look at Civil Service advice, good and honest thoug...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c794 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I understand that difference. I am saying that all 15,000 cardholders were informed specif...
-
Lord Stoddart of Swindon | 722 c794 (Link to this contribution) The House is listening with some incredulity to the defence the Minister is making of a mere £400,00...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c793-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I said that I will indeed confirm the advice that we have received on the legal aspects. ...
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c794 (Link to this contribution) I regret interrupting the Minister again but it really is crucial, if I may say so, for her to draw ...
-
Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 722 c795 (Link to this contribution) I see the position in which my noble friend finds herself. I respectfully submit to the House that i...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c794 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, support for the Irish Government, the national interest, the economic prosperity of this c...
-
Lord Maxton | 722 c804 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, at Second Reading of this Bill, I suggested that, while at the moment an identity card wou...
-
Earl of Erroll | 722 c804 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I fully understand the sentiment behind this, but I am not sure this is the best way to go...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c804-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, raises two issues. He spoke to t...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 722 c803 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I wonder if, when he comes to wind up, the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, could be a little more...
-
Lord Rosser | 722 c803 (Link to this contribution) We are not actually on Amendment 4. I have been speaking to Amendment 5.
-
Lord Stoddart of Swindon | 722 c805 (Link to this contribution) I have listened carefully to what the noble Baroness has said. It worries me that the Home Office se...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c805 (Link to this contribution) I am not quite sure how the noble Lord gained that impression. All I said, I think, was that identit...
-
Lord Maxton | 722 c805 (Link to this contribution) Does the noble Baroness not agree, however, that an identity card would be the easiest way of authen...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c805-6 (Link to this contribution) I think that this is a debate perhaps of a more expert kind, but I do not agree that that is the cas...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c800 (Link to this contribution) 4: After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause— ““Report on costs and savings (1) The Secretary ...
-
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 722 c796 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I have listened very carefully to what the noble Baroness has said on this matter, and I a...
-
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 722 c797 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this is a matter for resolution in the normal manner, which is that usual channels discuss...
-
Lord Rosser | 722 c802-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this amendment calls on the Government to produce a report on the impact of the repeal of ...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c801 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. She has said that the details that I require will be published and I ...
-
Lord Rosser | 722 c801-2 (Link to this contribution) 5: After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause— ““Identity fraud (1) The Secretary of State must...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c800-1 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the amendment is fairly straightforward, and I hope that it will be seen as a much-needed ...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c801 (Link to this contribution) The Government certainly agree that it is important that we are open and transparent about costs and...
-
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | 722 c784-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, my name is on Amendment 2. I led the opposition from these benches to the Identity Cards B...
-
Lord Pannick | 722 c785 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I support noble Lords who have spoken. Will the noble Baroness tell the House whether she ...
-
Lord Maxton | 722 c785 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, unlike the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, I supported the introduction of ID cards. I still op...
-
Lord Stoddart of Swindon | 722 c785-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the people who hold these cards, and there were not many of them, were inveigled into gett...
-
Baroness Hamwee | 722 c783 (Link to this contribution) I am confused—I do not know whether other noble Lords are. Is the noble Lord speaking to the first a...
-
Baroness Hamwee | 722 c783 (Link to this contribution) I did not hear because of the kerfuffle.
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c783-4 (Link to this contribution) In the flurry of Members leaving, the noble Baroness may have missed that my noble friend Lord Brett...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c782-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, we come to an important amendment, which I hope the Minister will be prepared to accept, t...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c782 (Link to this contribution) 2: Clause 2, page 2, line 5, at end insert— ““( ) giving cardholders the option of being reimbursed ...
-
Lord Shipley | 722 c790 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I would like to raise a further issue which relates to the wording of the amendment. It re...
-
Lord Vinson | 722 c789 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am sorry to speak from this side against the clause, but I believe that it is morally in...
-
Lord Richard | 722 c789 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I have taken no part in the debates concerning the Bill. Indeed, when I came in here this ...
-
Lord Deben | 722 c788 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I might concentrate on why people bought the card in the place. If they bought it, as it see...
-
Baroness Hamwee | 722 c788-9 (Link to this contribution) I must apologise to the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, for introducing him. I think that the technical term ...
-
Earl of Erroll | 722 c787-8 (Link to this contribution) I spoke on this matter in Committee. I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Brett, because I see that the...
-
Baroness Butler-Sloss | 722 c788 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I share the disquiet of many who have already spoken. I urge the Government to think again...
-
Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 722 c787 (Link to this contribution) What is being done here is to deprive the identity card of value by the main provisions of this Bill...
-
Lord Craig of Radley | 722 c787 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am equally concerned that for the sake of a very small amount of money the Government ar...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c790 (Link to this contribution) I think not, any more than if one uses a passport for that purpose, which is also a government docum...
-
Lord Maxton | 722 c790 (Link to this contribution) But the passport is being retained. It is still going to be a legal document, whereas presumably the...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c791 (Link to this contribution) If it is a valid document, it can be used validly for identity. If it is an invalid or cancelled doc...
-
Earl of Erroll | 722 c791 (Link to this contribution) Under Clause 6 about the possession of false identity documents, does the ID card once it has been r...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c791 (Link to this contribution) You are certainly no longer using a valid identity document. It is not any longer valid in law. The...
-
Lord Soley | 722 c791 (Link to this contribution) I am listening with some puzzlement. I am not a lawyer, but the Minister has signed off this Bill as...
-
Earl of Erroll | 722 c790 (Link to this contribution) Excuse me, but that was the opinion of the Opposition at the time, not of the Government.
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c790 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I recognise the strength of sentiment expressed on all sides of the House. If the House wi...
-
Lord Maxton | 722 c790 (Link to this contribution) I hear what the noble Baroness has just said about the card being government property. Is she saying...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c790 (Link to this contribution) The noble Earl is quite right. It has always been the intention, whether in opposition or in governm...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c792-3 (Link to this contribution) The point I was answering before noble Lords intervened was the inference somehow that we are inflic...
-
Lord Deben | 722 c793 (Link to this contribution) I understand that there may be technical reasons why my proposal does not work, but surely they do n...
-
Lord Davies of Stamford | 722 c792 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness is getting into the complexities and numbers of this. Is this not a matter of sim...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c793 (Link to this contribution) I am sorry; I thought that the noble Lord was suggesting that this card should be available for use ...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c791 (Link to this contribution) As I have just said, we do not believe that we are expropriating anybody of their rights. If this is...
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c792 (Link to this contribution) I am not sure that I can confirm that. I will to seek to do so before Third Reading. We should not ...
-
Lord Morris of Aberavon | 722 c792 (Link to this contribution) Is the advice from the law officers?
-
Baroness Neville-Jones | 722 c792 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I will confirm the advice that I have received.
-
Lord Morris of Aberavon | 722 c791-2 (Link to this contribution) May I follow that point? The Minister has made the proposition that there is no right in contract by...
-
Baroness Noakes | 722 c795 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I will pick up the point made by the noble Earl, Lord Erroll. It might help the House if m...
-
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 722 c796 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, there have been interventions on Report that have not been in the customary style that we ...
-
Earl of Erroll | 722 c794-5 (Link to this contribution) Before the noble Baroness sits down, will she guarantee to come back with an amendment along the lin...
-
Baroness Hamwee | 722 c803-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, perhaps the Minister could confirm that he would be happier—I am not quite sure that I too...
-
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 722 c797-800 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I have heard with a great deal of interest the comments from the Captain of the Gentlemen-...
-
Lord Brett | 722 c786-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, Amendment 1 was not moved not because the Minister convinced me in Committee of her argume...
- Subjects
- Compensation Databases Costs Identity cards Personation National identity register Reviews
- Legislation
- Identity Documents Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all contributions (104)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-02-08 19:24:13 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_88591
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_88591
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_88591