Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Documents Bill.
Identity Documents Bill
My Lords, this is a matter for resolution in the normal manner, which is that usual channels discuss these issues. I understand, as Government Chief Whip, that it would be appropriate for the Opposition to bring forward an amendment if they felt that the government amendment or failure to act was inappropriate. These are the matters that are discussed in the usual manner; as the noble Lord, Lord Bassam, says, we have had these discussions in the past. It may perhaps assist the House to recall that over the last few months the Public Bill Office has on two occasions advised Opposition Members that they may table Third Reading amendments to take forward matters that have been debated on previous occasions. We do enjoy a fair amount of latitude—I say fair because it is fair to all—within the overall context that Third Reading is not intended to open new issues.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 722 c797
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:45:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682822
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682822
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682822