Proceeding contribution from Lord Sassoon (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance (No. 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
My Lords, as I said, a Question has been tabled and I shall answer it then. I have already referred the House to the two meanings in the Oxford English Dictionary first edition of 1888, which I think explains it very well. We had a reference to PIMCO earlier in the debate from my noble friend Lord Ryder of Wensum. I refer the noble Lord to the comments of the founder of PIMCO a few months before the election when he talked about the toxic pile. He may or may not have been front-running a position, but when the largest bondholder in the world talks about UK debt in toxic terms, the point is well understood. The critical question that arises from all of this—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 722 c975-6
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Corporation tax Banks Capital investment Borrowing Film Financial institutions Economic situation Public expenditure Public sector debt Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation VAT Trusts Tax rates and bands Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:45:14 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_684078
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_684078
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_684078