Proceeding contribution from Lord Eatwell (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance (No. 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
On child benefit, I did not argue that it was not inappropriate for the burdens of deficit reduction to be widely shared; I argued that the Government’s policy will not work. It has not been thought through. It is incompatible with the structure of child benefit as it is paid today. Perhaps the Minister would like to take my example of a top-rate-paying taxpayer who, on the death of her husband, moves in with a daughter who is receiving child benefit. Is that grandmother going to be fined by the Chancellor or will her daughter lose her child benefit? I do not think that is very family friendly. Do you?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 722 c977
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Corporation tax Banks Capital investment Borrowing Film Financial institutions Economic situation Public expenditure Public sector debt Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation VAT Trusts Tax rates and bands Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:45:08 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_684083
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_684083
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_684083