Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Eatwell (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance (No. 2) Bill.


Finance (No. 2) Bill

On child benefit, I did not argue that it was not inappropriate for the burdens of deficit reduction to be widely shared; I argued that the Government’s policy will not work. It has not been thought through. It is incompatible with the structure of child benefit as it is paid today. Perhaps the Minister would like to take my example of a top-rate-paying taxpayer who, on the death of her husband, moves in with a daughter who is receiving child benefit. Is that grandmother going to be fined by the Chancellor or will her daughter lose her child benefit? I do not think that is very family friendly. Do you?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c977 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Corporation tax Banks Capital investment Borrowing Film Financial institutions Economic situation Public expenditure Public sector debt Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation VAT Trusts Tax rates and bands Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme
Legislation
Finance (No. 2) Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk