Proceeding contribution from Lord Strathclyde (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 November 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on NATO Summit.
NATO Summit
My Lords, the noble Lord has my sympathy about his having a little difficulty in getting to grips with the rhythm of business, but I am sure that he will get used to it. He is a good attendee, and I am sure that that will happen very soon. The thrust of the noble Lord’s question is that there is a tension between declared UK government policy on states that do not hold nuclear weapons and that of the strategic concept launched this week by NATO, which does not hold such a position. I do not know whether this tension is cosmetic or real, and I am unable to resolve that at the Dispatch Box. Perhaps I could consider the issue and give a little more thought to it before responding to the noble Lord.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 722 c986
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Cost effectiveness European Union Peacekeeping operations Military alliances Reform Afghanistan NATO Russia Ballistic missile defence Military aid ISAF NATO-Russia Council
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:45:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_684097
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_684097
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_684097