Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Gauke (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 23 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.


National Insurance Contributions Bill

The fact is that the Labour party would have raised the full amount. We are offsetting £3 billion, which will be most helpful for employers whose employees earn under £20,000. The package is good for employment and, given the fiscal mess that we inherited, I am very proud that this Government are able to reform national insurance contributions exactly as we set out in our manifesto at the general election, and in the coalition agreement. As far as we can deduce it, the Labour party's position is that it wants to do more to reduce the deficit by raising taxation and it does not believe in increasing VAT, which will bring in £13 billion a year. We can assume only that it would favour greater increases in national insurance contributions than it had already set out. We are not going to take any lectures; this Government have managed to reverse a very painful and damaging policy that would have meant employers' contributions rising for every single employee paying national insurance—and in a way that would have damaged jobs in this country.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
519 c192 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Business Employment Employees' contributions Employers' contributions Increases National insurance contributions New businesses Tax allowances VAT Tax rates and bands Labour market
Legislation
National Insurance Contributions Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk