---

School Sports Funding

Not the gentleman who forced down the price of Chelsea strips everywhere. That was not all he forced down, but I will put that to one side. This is a serious point. David Meller says:"““The quality and effectiveness of””" the existing approach has"““varied from borough to borough””—" exactly my point—and that the"““structure is overly bureaucratic and not sufficiently focused on delivery.””" Let me mention someone else who has a valid point to make in this debate—the hon. Member for Vauxhall (Kate Hoey), who used to be Minister for Sport. I do not know whether the right hon. Member for Leigh has respect for the hon. Lady, but I certainly do. She says:"““It was always expected that, if School Sports Partnerships were a success, they would become embedded and the Youth Sport Trust would then withdraw. If schools and parents feel that their SSP has been valuable, I suspect that it—or at least many of its functions—will continue in some form. Where the contribution of the SSP has not proved valuable, new solutions will be sought. This is exactly how it should be: schools themselves taking more responsibility for school sport.””" Steve Kibble, an individual who delivers sport for a local authority in Devon, has written to me, as have several other teachers and head teachers. He points out that in his area, school sports partnerships"““have drawn down £1.4M per year””" and argues that"““if the money had gone direct to schools we would have had £4,110 per school per year to invest in PE””," noting that instead some schools have had just £200. Those are all powerful voices who care about sport just as much as the right hon. Gentleman, and who say that we can reform the way in which we deliver school sport.