Proceeding contribution from Lord Blunkett (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 2 December 2010. It occurred during Backbench debate on Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority.
Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
I should like initially to make it absolutely clear that the dog has claimed no allowances whatever! The hon. Gentleman knows, because I have communicated this point to him, that we need to reflect on the public's reaction a year ago. Indeed, I contributed to the discussion in January and was in favour of a much simpler administrative scheme than the current one. Is the review at the beginning of January not an opportunity to try to get the system right, in a non-adversarial way; to take the public or, at least, the opinion-formers with us, rather than back a year; to make the job of IPSA staff, whom he rightly praises for trying to operate a difficult system, much easier; and to ensure, therefore, that MPs benefit from a simpler process, the public benefit from a cheaper process and the world outside believes that we have not once again lost our marbles?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 519 c1021
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Administration Costs Allowances Bureaucracy Families Payments Members Location Members' constituency work Members' staff Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 20:03:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_688608
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_688608
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_688608