Proceeding contribution from Julian Huppert (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 December 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Bill [Lords].
Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Bill [Lords]
I will speak briefly to amendments 6 to 10, which come from the Joint Committee on Human Rights, on which I am privileged to serve. I agree with the right hon. Member for Delyn (Mr Hanson) that the key issue is the independence of the reviewer. The amendments seek to strengthen that independence, by ensuring that the reviewer is a creature not of Government, but of Parliament. Being nominated by Government and approved by Parliament would give the reviewer greater independence. There is also a question of accountability. Who should hold accountability on behalf of the British public—Parliament or Government? Should the reviewer's report go directly to Parliament, or should there be the potential for it to be filtered by Government? Although I accept that that does not generally happen, there is the potential for it to happen.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 520 c868
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Civil liberties Assets Terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorist Asset-freezing etc Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:53:11 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_693807
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_693807
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_693807