Proceeding contribution from Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 December 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Public Bodies Bill [HL].
Public Bodies Bill [HL]
I thank the Minister very much indeed for that helpful reply. A number of issues that remain unresolved were mentioned by myself, my noble friend Lord Rosser and, indeed, by the noble Lord, Lord Greaves. If, on reflection, the Minister feels that he is able to give some more information in writing, that would be very welcome. The decision to abolish BRB (Residuary) Ltd is not controversial—indeed, it was taken by the previous Administration—but I was anxious to ensure that things were not done in a rush or in a way that might result in the assets being sold for much less than is possible. I am satisfied by the Minister’s response, and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 25 withdrawn. Amendment 26 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 723 c528
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Assets Costs British Rail Coroners Public appointments Property transfer Public bodies Property Railways Railway network Non-departmental public bodies Chief Coroner
- Legislation
- Public Bodies Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:49:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_694377
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_694377
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_694377